At the Teoh Beng Hock death Inquiry, Thai forensic expert, Dr, Pornthip Rojanasunand (left)declared without fear and favour that there was a 80% possibility the death of Teoh Beng Hock was homicide. Without fear because she feared neither the Malaysian police, MACC or the government. Without favour because she does not owe the Malaysian government or anyone a living. But I cannot say the same for our 2 own pathologists , Dr. Khairul Aznam Ibrahim and Dr Prashant Naresh Samberkar whose livelihood depends on the pleasure of those who employ them. So whose findings or reports would you believe? Dr. Pornthip, the director-general of Thailand’s Central Institute of Forensic Science (CIFS)and who has carried out over 10,000 autopsies over the last 27 years, stated that Beng Hock was alive but was unconscious when he hit the ground, that he had been manually strangled and suffered anal penetration before he fell., that he was beaten with a stick on his thighs, and that his skull was fractured as a result of a blunt force being applied to it. And she could come to such conclusion after only going through Teoh’s autopsy report and photographs of his injuries. So can you imagine how much she will be able to reveal if she had done an autopsy herself.
With the above revelation, there is now a possibility of a second autopsy and for the sake of justice, it is hoped that all parties will agree to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment